2013 Chrysler 300 vs 2013 Toyota Avalon
How does the Chrysler 300 stack up?
The full-size segment is getting some quality entries in it as of late. And the added competition means that the options are going to get even better. For the sake of our customers, we thought we would provide a detailed comparison pitting one of our models against its top competitor. We will be looking at the 2013 Chrysler 300 vs 2013 Toyota Avalon. The two vehicles seem to be popular with consumers, so the competition is a heated one. Let’s see how they stack up.
The first item of note would be the physical appearance of the vehicles. The 2013 Chrysler 300 is slightly larger than the Avalon in physical size. And that transfers to additional room for back seat passengers. The 300 has 40.1 inches of rear leg room compared to 39.2 inches on the Avalon. The rear shoulder room is also marginally larger on the 300. While it may only be a few inches, when you are riding in the back seat of a vehicle, every inch counts. Even the cargo capacity is slightly better on the 300.
The Avalon can’t quite stack up to the Chrysler 300.
As for fuel mileage on the 2013 Chrysler 300 vs 2013 Toyota Avalon, the models are equal at 31 MPG highway fuel economy. But, the larger fuel tank on the 300 allows it to have an extended range of 592 miles compared to just 527 on the Avalon. Again, the little things go a long way when comparing the two models.
If you need one more comparison point between the 2013 Chrysler 300 and 2013 Toyota Avalon, consider that the 300 also has a more powerful engine. The 3.6-liter six-cylinder on the 300 provides output of 292 horsepower while the 3.5 on the Avalon has output of 268 horsepower.
So there you have it. When all factors are considered, it would seem that the 300 is a better option for many reasons. But, the decision is up to you in the end. Want to know more? Contact Palmen of Racine and get the info you want!
